Questions - Revision history

AMcMichael at 05:02, 17 February 2015

2015-02-17T05:02:21Z

GEsperdy at 18:49, 12 February 2015

2015-02-12T18:49:59Z

LDowns at 19:54, 6 February 2015

2015-02-06T19:54:26Z

PJaskot at 15:39, 6 February 2015

2015-02-06T15:39:19Z

PJaskot at 22:42, 29 January 2015

2015-01-29T22:42:32Z

ARumsey at 22:45, 28 January 2015

2015-01-28T22:45:24Z

PJaskot at 22:02, 28 January 2015

2015-01-28T22:02:03Z

AWhiteside at 15:54, 19 January 2015

2015-01-19T15:54:58Z

AWhiteside at 15:54, 19 January 2015

2015-01-19T15:54:24Z

PJaskot at 15:53, 13 January 2015

2015-01-13T15:53:23Z

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
   '''SURVEY QUESTIONS'''
+'''Demographic questions'''
 Are there students and faculty in your department who are using digital tools and sources for their primary research?
 *Is your department or school prepared to evaluate digital research projects for promotion?

@@ Line 32: / Line 32: @@
 *What categories of criteria should be addressed for all digital research projects? How do you define each category?
 *Does your institution require a student or faculty member to prepare a written description of their digital research project before being reviewed for promotion or tenure?
-*Does your institution have a working definition of digital scholarship? digital art history?
+*Does your institution have a working definition of digital scholarship? digital art/architectural history?
 *Does your institution have clear standards for evaluating different kinds of digital art and architectural historical projects? Do you make distinctions, e.g., between development of digital tools that have significant art/architectural historical uses vs. use of preexisting digital tools for significant art/architectural scholarship? Are both of these kinds of scholarship considered "art or architectural history" in your department?
 *How are collaborative projects more generally evaluated within your department (e.g., work on an exhibition, co-editing an anthology, etc.)? Do you have specific guidelines in your personnel bylaws for this?
-*Do you think digital art history is the same as art history? if not, what elements of digital scholarship work do you see as distinctive, especially in regards to evaluating their quality or impact?
+*Do you think digital art/architectural history is the same as art/architectural history? if not, what elements of digital scholarship work do you see as distinctive, especially in regards to evaluating their quality or impact?
 *Does your institution require posting digital research in a university repository? What format is required?

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-*Are there students and faculty in your department who are using digital tools and sources for their primary research?
+*NB: There are two sets of questions that will be needed--one set for the survey of 'yes/no and check-off' and another set of open-ended questions for the interviews by the researcher.
-*If so, please describe the content and technology used.
 **What support does your institution offer for development of digital research projects? Do you have support from Academic Technology or Educational Technology services? The Library?
 **Where do you find expertise such as programmers,  web developers, and other technologists to work with?
-*Is your department or school prepared to evaluate digital research projects for promotion?
+*Do you have evaluation criteria for digital scholarship?
 *If so, how would you approach the evaluation?
 *Is it necessary for the student or faculty member being evaluated to call in an expert in digital media and an expert in their sub discipline to evaluate a digital research project?
 *If so, how are these individuals identified?
@@ Line 14: / Line 36: @@
 *How are collaborative projects more generally evaluated within your department (e.g., work on an exhibition, co-editing an anthology, etc.)? Do you have specific guidelines in your personnel bylaws for this?
 *Do you think digital art history is the same as art history? if not, what elements of digital scholarship work do you see as distinctive, especially in regards to evaluating their quality or impact?

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 *Does your institution require a student or faculty member to prepare a written description of their digital research project before being reviewed for promotion or tenure?
 *Does your institution have a working definition of digital scholarship? digital art history?
-*Does your institution have clear standards for evaluating different kinds of digital art and architectural historical projects? Do you make distinctions, e.g., between development of digital tools that have significant art/architectural historical uses vs. use of preexisting digital tools for significant art/architectural scholarship? Are both "art or architectural history" in your department?
+*Does your institution have clear standards for evaluating different kinds of digital art and architectural historical projects? Do you make distinctions, e.g., between development of digital tools that have significant art/architectural historical uses vs. use of preexisting digital tools for significant art/architectural scholarship? Are both of these kinds of scholarship considered "art or architectural history" in your department?
 *How are collaborative projects more generally evaluated within your department (e.g., work on an exhibition, co-editing an anthology, etc.)? Do you have specific guidelines in your personnel bylaws for this?
 *Do you think digital art history is the same as art history? if not, what elements of digital scholarship work do you see as distinctive, especially in regards to evaluating their quality or impact?

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 *Does your institution require a student or faculty member to prepare a written description of their digital research project before being reviewed for promotion or tenure?
 *Does your institution have a working definition of digital scholarship? digital art history?
-*Does your institution have clear standards for evaluating applied versus basic research in the digital scholarship? Are these terms that are familiar to you? [TO BE EDITED BY PBJ]
+*Does your institution have clear standards for evaluating different kinds of digital art and architectural historical projects? Do you make distinctions, e.g., between development of digital tools that have significant art/architectural historical uses vs. use of preexisting digital tools for significant art/architectural scholarship? Are both "art or architectural history" in your department?
 *How are collaborative projects more generally evaluated within your department (e.g., work on an exhibition, co-editing an anthology, etc.)? Do you have specific guidelines in your personnel bylaws for this?
 *Do you think digital art history is the same as art history? if not, what elements of digital scholarship work do you see as distinctive, especially in regards to evaluating their quality or impact?

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 *Does your institution require a student or faculty member to prepare a written description of their digital research project before being reviewed for promotion or tenure?
 *Does your institution have a working definition of digital humanities? digital art history?
-*Does your institution have clear standards for evaluating applied versus basic research in the digital humanities? Are these terms that are familiar to you?
+*Does your institution have clear standards for evaluating applied versus basic research in the digital humanities? Are these terms that are familiar to you? [TO BE EDITED BY PBJ]
 *How are collaborative projects more generally evaluated within your department (e.g., work on an exhibition, co-editing an anthology, etc.)? Do you have specific guidelines in your personnel bylaws for this?
 *Do you think digital art history is the same as art history? if not, what elements of digital humanities work do you see as distinctive, especially in regards to evaluating their quality or impact?