View source for Guidelines and Best Practices

<u>Modern Language Association:https</u>

*//www.mla.org/guidelines_evaluation_digital

*http://wiki.mla.org/index.php/Documenting_a_New_Media_Case


<u>American Historial Association</u>

*http://blog.historians.org/2014/01/committee-professional-evaluation-digital-scholarship-historians/
*http://digital.wiki.collegeart.org/pdf/AHADraftGuidelinesMeetingNotes.pdf
*http://digital.wiki.collegeart.org/pdf/AHADraftGuidelinesEvaluationofDigitalScholarship.pdf
*http://digital.wiki.collegeart.org/pdf/AHADraftGuidelineswithAppendices.pdf


<u>Networked Infrastructure for Nineteenth-Century Electronic Scholarship (NINES)</u>

*http://institutes.nines.org/docs/2011-documents/guidelines-for-promotion-and-tenure-committees-in-judging-digital-work/


<u>UCLA Center for Digital Humanities</u>

*http://humanitiesblast.com/Evaluating_digital_scholarship.pdf

<u>University of Wisconsin, Madison, Dept. of Geography</u>

*http://www.geography.wisc.edu/ (They do not have guidelines listed, but this is a leading geography department with physical, cultural and human geography, i.e. they will have tenure procedures for both those that are working in basic and applied computational geography as well as guidelines on collaboration)

<u>Aggregate</u>

*http://www.we-aggregate.org/piece/aggregate-peer-review-statement : This is an architectural history collaborative and online journal with a developed peer-review process that includes born-digital publications. It may be of use as a point of reference.